Insurance Sharpies

November 25, 2008

Insurance sharpies

Public Forum Letter

 

I got irritated reading “Medicare’s open enrollment: Seniors face higher premiums” (Tribune, Nov. 15). Why should health insurance selection for seniors or anyone else be a trick question? Why do we have to pit our brains against corporate lawyers and spin-doctors, who are hired to protect the insurers’ interests?

To those who say competition improves the product, that is only so when the buyer and the seller have roughly the same level of information. With medical insurance, that is not so.

I am fed up with the United States paying more for health care per capita than most of the developed world, and yet living shorter lives and suffering poorer outcomes. Too much of our health-insurance dollar goes to sales and weasel-wording sharpies.

This is the point where we get the story about someone in Canada who had to wait six weeks for a non-emergency procedure. Well, if they wanted to, Canadians could dump their national health insurance and go back to insurance companies. They seem to have no inclination to do so.

We should give national health insurance a chance.

Gary McCarty

Salt Lake City

Source: Salt Lake City Tribune

Questions Please call Politi Insurance Agents & Brokers

818-709-8442

www.health-insurancecalifornia.com

 


Inching Along: Insurance Industry’s Shift on health care is a sign of Change

November 25, 2008

EDITORIAL: Inching along: Insurance industry’s shift on health care is a sign of change

 

(Beaver County Times (Beaver, PA) Via Acquire Media NewsEdge) Nov. 23–Just talking about national health care is an indication of how broken Congress is.

Basically, the topic has been ignored for the last eight years, even as the health care in America has been imploding.

Economically, health care in the United States eats up a larger percentage of GDP than any other industrialized nation. Financially, businesses and individuals are paying more and more for less and less. Medically, the United States lags behind other developed nations in many categories. Demographically, some 45 million Americans have no health-care coverage, and millions more are underinsured. Bureaucratically, the system is a mind-boggling mess.

But because of the political and ideological gridlock of the last eight years and memories of the Clinton health-care debacle 15 years ago, members of Congress have allowed this mess to fester, showing little regard for their responsibilities to the American people.

They have, however, been more than willing to do the bidding of special interest groups, especially the pharmaceutical and insurance industries, in return for hefty political support in the form of campaign contributions.

The result is the current mess, a system that nobody is happy with.

But times have changed, and just about everybody involved in health care understands that the status quo cannot be sustained.

That’s why last week’s announcement by the health insurance industry that it will support a national health care overhaul that requires them to accept all customers, regardless of pre-existing medical conditions, is a major step forward, even if it does come with a major caveat. It will do so only if Congress mandates that everyone buys coverage.

While the board of directors for America’s Health Insurance Plans announcement is important, it must be recognized as the start of a long process. It is encouraging, though, because it represents the possibility of action after years of inaction.

The goal now is to carry this discussion forward until some form of national health care coverage is achieved.

To see more of Beaver County Times, Pa., or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to

Source: http://www.timesonline.com.

Questions Call Politi Insurance Agents & Brokers

818-709-8442

www.health-insurancecalifornia.com


Gohealth insurnance partners with Online health news source healthday.com

November 25, 2008

GoHealth Insurance Partners With Online Health News Source HealthDay.com

Health News Website HealthDay.com Partners With Insurance Portal GoHealthInsurance.com to Bring Daily Health Care and Health Insurance News to Online Insurance Shoppers; HealthDay.com Reports on a Wide Variety of Health Care and Health Insurance Topics for Consumers and Physicians

Last update: 8:00 a.m. EST Nov. 21, 2008
CHICAGO, IL, Nov 21, 2008 (MARKET WIRE via COMTEX) — Online health insurance portal GoHealthInsurance.com recently partnered with HealthDay.com ( http://www.healthday.com) an online health news syndicator based in Norwalk, Connecticut, to provide health insurance shoppers with the latest in health and health insurance news.
At GoHealthInsurance.com, shoppers can read HealthDay.com’s daily news feed to stay informed about top health news stories around the world.
HealthDay.com covers a vast range of health and health care topics — including everything from physical and mental health to environmental health to health technology. The online news syndicator also reports on breaking medical insurance news and trends in the insurance industry.
In addition to breaking health news, HealthDay.com also keeps readers up-to-date on the latest prescription drug approvals by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), along with providing some helpful health tips for everyday well-being.
“HealthDay.com’s daily news articles are a great way to stay informed about the most pressing health care issues,” said Brandon Cruz, President and CTO of GoHealth Insurance’s parent company, Norvax, Inc. “We’re proud to partner with a trusted online news source like HealthDay.com to provide health and health insurance news to consumers every day on GoHealthInsurance.com.”
For health professionals, there is also a news section devoted to physicians at HealthDay.com. The “Physician’s Briefing” health news section reports on top stories from the peer-reviewed medical journals all over the world and covers reports from the FDA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Health professionals must register to view articles in the Physician’s Briefing.
HealthDay.com is a renowned health news source featured in major web health sites such as HealthFinder from HHS and MedlinePlus from the NIH, in online portals such as Yahoo!, MSN.com, and EverydayHealth, and in news publications including the Washington Post, Forbes, and BusinessWeek. They have been awarded with the Platinum Award for Best Health/Healthcare Content from eHealthcare Strategy & Trends three years in a row from 2006 to 2008.
The news feed on HealthDay.com is also available in Spanish and Japanese.
To find the daily HealthDay.com news feed at GoHealthInsurance.com, browse to www.gohealthinsurance.com/medical-news/.
About GoHealth Insurance
GoHealthInsurance.com makes buying health insurance simple. GoHealth Insurance explains health coverage options in plain English, provides free individual and group health insurance quotes, connects shoppers with local agents, and helps consumers choose plans that meet their health and budget needs.
Source: Marketwatch.com
Questions Call Politi Insurance Agents & Brokers
818-709-8442

Advocates fear children will lose health insurance

November 25, 2008

Advocates fear children will lose health insurance

JONDI GUMZ – Sentinel staff writer

 

 

Advocates worry that state budget cutbacks will jeopardize health coverage for 80,000 children in California, including more than 1,500 in Santa Cruz County, next year.

“In hard economic times, when families need support and services most, we’re seeing cutbacks and rollbacks,” said Leslie Conner, who oversees Santa Cruz Healthy Kids, a low-cost health insurance program for children. “We’re committed to sustaining the program as long as we can.”

About 98 percent of children in Santa Cruz County have health insurance. The state’s financial difficulties could hurt local efforts, Conner said, noting Healthy Families, a statewide insurance program, is facing a $17 million deficit this year.

That could result in a freeze on enrollment, the first in the program’s 10-year history. Such a freeze could put an estimated 1,000 Santa Cruz County children on a wait list for coverage.

“Note that the freeze comes at a time of unprecedented enrollment levels across the state: 27,000 eligible children are applying each month,” Conner said.

The state plans to require families on Medi-Cal to re-register every six months, which Conner said “will no doubt knock families off its rolls.” Some 1,500 children in Santa Cruz County could lose coverage as a result.

In addition, Healthy Families will charge families a higher premium to shore up its finances.

“We expect additional families to drop off because they can’t afford the increase,” Conner said.

 

She welcomed an announcement from The California Endowment Tuesday granting $425,000 to Santa Cruz Healthy Kids. The award was part of a $7.75 million granted statewide to support local initiatives serving uninsured children.

A UC study this year found Healthy Kids saved the state $7.3 million a year by preventing more than 1,000 unnecessary hospitalizations, and another study found participating children missed school less frequently and did better academically.

“We cannot allow these programs to simply die on the vine due to state inaction,” said Robert Phillips of The California Endowment.

Source: www.mercurynews.com

Questions Call Politi Insurance Agents & Brokers

www.health-insurancecalifornia.com

818-709-8442


Has the Health-Insurance Industry Buckled on Reform? Sort of, But Not Really

November 25, 2008

When the Clinton health plan died in 1994, the health-insurance industry’s fingerprints were all over the murder weapon. Now that rumblings of comprehensive healthcare reform are starting to take on critical mass in the incoming Obama administration and Congress, the insurance industry has apparently reconsidered its adamant objection to a major health-system overhaul — and flinched, at least a little.

The big news on this front came yesterday, when the two giant health-insurance trade associations — America’s Health-Insurance Plans and the BlueCross BlueShield Association — said their members could accept a reform plan that banned the key business practice of medical underwriting, under which insurers limit or deny coverage to individuals with pre-existing medical conditions (i.e., people who would otherwise cost insurers too much). The price: Washington would also have to require all Americans to buy insurance with the much-chattered-about “individual mandate.” (See the AHIP statement and the BCBSA statement.)

There’s no denying the significance of this concession, even if both organizations have hinted for some time that they’d be willing to broker a deal once momentum for reform started building. That’s because medical underwriting is, in many respects, the foundation of the modern health-insurance industry — one of the primary tools health plans use to keep medical costs down and profits up. For some insurers, in fact, medical underwriting seems to represent the bulk of their business plan –  and when it fails, so do they.

The quid pro quo here makes a certain amount of sense, even if it’s still not the best deal for insurers. Expanding the customer base by requiring everyone to buy insurance is a fairly attractive proposition for health plans that have been shedding their most profitable members at a brisk rate for the past year or two. It’s also necessary on an actuarial basis to bring in healthier (read: lower-cost) individuals to balance out the risk of insuring a sicker population.

The deal almost certainly isn’t the sort of arrangement companies like UnitedHealth Group and WellPoint would agree to were times better. What it suggests, in fact, is that the big insurers — already battered by the whirlwind that’s raged through their business for the past year — seem to understand that they’re holding a weak hand. It’s as if they’re actually starting to understand that their existing business model is fundamentally broken, and that to carry on as they have is to risk radical downsizing or extinction.

There are plenty of unanswered questions in this deal, making it much more a starting point for negotiations than the finish line. Some, of course, are more serious than others. The NYT, for instance, makes a big deal out of the fact that President-elect Barack Obama opposed an individual mandate during his campaign, while I’ve long suspected his opposition was more a tactical matter of electoral politics than a bedrock position — largely because expanding coverage without an individual mandate or something like it makes little sense. (The insurers actually have a point when they argue that without it, many people will sign up for insurance only when they’re sick, eliminating the pooling of risk insurance is all about and driving up costs for everyone.)

But here are some other big issues that we’ll be hearing a lot more about in coming days and weeks:

  • Enforcement of the mandate. No one yet has come up with combination of carrots and sticks that’s isnt’ either wholly inadequate (the Massachusetts model) or politically toxic.
  • Premium costs. The insurers pointedly did not agree to “community rating,” in which all individuals in a defined insurance pool pay the same premium. (Group insurance offered by employers typically works this way.) Community rating means that healthy people subsidize the costs of the sick, whereas in today’s individual market, insurers typically charge more to people who are older, sicker, living unhealthy lifestyles and similar factors. Community rating means premiums are higher on average, but the alternative means that insurers may well offer plans to sick people that they simply can’t afford.
  • Government-run  insurance. Plans sketched out by Obama and Sen. Max Baucus envision setting up a government-run health plan — a kind of mini-Medicare — that individuals could choose instead of private plans if they chose. Although federal employees can already opt for such a plan in their health program (known technically as the Federal Employees Health Benefits plan), insurers hate the idea of competing directly against the government, with some reportedly calling it a dealbreaker for comprehensive reform.

And that’s just for starters. Like I said, there will be plenty of fireworks as this process gets underway, so pop some popcorn and get ready.

Source: www./industry.bnet.com

Questions Call Politi Insuranece Agents & Brokers

www.health-insurancecalifornia.com

818-709-8442


Why the Doctor can’t see you now

November 25, 2008

Why the doctor can’t see you now

By S. SMILEY THAKUR
GUEST COLUMNIST

Physicians have been keeping a secret from you: The practice of medicine simply isn’t a viable business. This reality affects not only the availability of doctors to care for patients, but also the quality of delivered care. After 10 years in full-time clinical practice, I decided to stop accepting Medicare and all private insurance. Such a move seems illogical to physicians and patients, but was made to preserve patient access to quality care. Physicians who don’t come to the same conclusion risk going out of business.

The doctor-patient relationship is suffering. While much attention has been paid to the uninsured and a universal health plan, those are not the core issues. What good is insurance if it doesn’t cover the cost of providing care or if no doctor takes it? What good is universal health care if doctors have left the profession?

Relevant, but beyond the reach of individual patients and doctors, is the larger ethical issue of participating in a government program that expects young workers to pay for the care their elders.

Medicine is a calling. We want doctors who are accessible, good listeners and inquisitive thinkers. Unhurried, on-time visits and house calls, however, all seem antiquated notions as they’ve been dropped from the doctor’s medical bag long ago. How doctors interact with patients has changed substantially since 1966, the year Medicare started. Patients notice the doctor is always late and visits are hurried. Ever wonder why your primary care doctor doesn’t come see you in the hospital? And where have all the one-doctor offices gone? Have you ever tried to find a doctor who takes your insurance but had difficulty?

Patients should be concerned about their access to an adequate supply of physicians. In Washington, 57 percent of physicians either don’t accept new or take any Medicare patients; 45 percent of Washington physicians are older than 50, an age group that is limiting the size of their practice. Some sources estimate the shortage of physicians to be between 96,000 and 200,000 by the year 2020. Doctors are soon to be in short supply.

Medicare and insurers have a coercive relationship with doctors. Physicians must sign contracts with Medicare in order to get reimbursed for services provided to this large patient population. There is no negotiating a rate with the government. When dealing with insurers that cover thousands of lives, the physician similarly has little bargaining power. Physicians are barred from joining together as individuals to negotiate collectively as that is viewed as anti-trust. That impels individual physicians to merge into large groups in order to negotiate with insurers.

Doctors must accept what Medicare states is the value of their services. That is known as price fixing. The amount changes annually. Only face-to-face time is considered part of the chargeable visit. Other essential services to facilitate patient care, such as phone calls, and coordinating care, are considered included and are thus unpaid work that occurs after the patient leaves. Government and private insurance intrusion in the form of documentation, coding and billing requirements, are just some of the unfunded mandates doctors are struggling to satisfy. It is easy to understand why doctors rush patient visits in order to budget time for those tasks.

From a physician point of view, it is difficult to be intellectually curious when time is pressured. Conscientious physicians who ask questions and listen are rewarded with a lengthening workday. Many primary care physicians turn hospital care over to hospitalists, as there isn’t time to manage the office and hospital simultaneously. Thus, how care is financed has a direct effect on how patients can access their physician in the office and hospital.

Physicians yearn for relief. Medicare reimbursement in Washington is 42nd (lowest) out of 50 states. Some physicians support a universal health plan, believing getting paid something for their service is better than nothing. This bypasses the essence of the problem: Physicians lack the ability to determine the value of their own services. That is the root cause of physicians not being able to keep up with expenses and distinguishes our profession from all others.

Doctors follow the health of the Medicare system with concern. Medicare was set up initially as a safety net, but has now become the standard level of payment for service. Physicians typically have 30 percent to 70 percent of their patients using Medicare as their primary insurance. The Medicare Part A (hospital) fund will go bankrupt by 2018. Part B reimbursements will decline coupled with rising costs of providing service. The Medicare Trustees Report of 2005 projected a cumulative 28 percent decrease in reimbursement from 2006 to 2014. The projected cost of providing medical care, however, would increase by 22 percent. Thus physicians find themselves in the unusual position of having to shield themselves from overexposure to Medicare patients.

Certainly Congress did step in to avert the planned cuts of January 2007, January 2008, July 1, 2008, and July 15, 2008. The last cut (10.4 percent), however, was delayed only when the American Medical Association lobbied Congress with physician surveys indicating 60 percent of physicians would stop taking new Medicare patients if it went through. There is now an estimated 20.5 percent cut projected in 2010. It is hard to imagine any business planning growth when such large reimbursement uncertainties occur on a yearly basis.

Physicians know they are beat in the reimbursement solution to this problem. Their costs go up and contractually they can’t charge (balance bill) the patient to cover the shortfall. Physicians are also prohibited from accepting additional payment offered by patients. Physicians have two options. The first is to see more patients: Do 14 hours of work in 10 hours, and be paid for eight. The other is to stop taking new Medicare patients or withdraw services entirely. The Medicare card thus becomes a liability to patients who hold it.

Physicians turning away patients is only part of the physician access problem. Competitive demand among seniors will grow. As of 2004, there were already 775,000 Medicare beneficiaries in Washington. According to a 2005 state Department of Health report on primary health care access, about 400,000 will join between 2010 and 2020. More patients but fewer doctors.

The solution is to focus on the doctor-patient relationship, as it was before 1966. When the physician’s contribution was considered a service, not a right. As a service, the patient and doctor mutually could agree on a value. Compassion, availability, experience, skill, and price would determine the value of a physician. Patients who didn’t perceive value could simply go to another. Physicians and patients would be also be freed from “choosing” each other solely on the basis that they were on the same insurance panel.

It is our calling to serve the needy. Contracts, however, dictate a physician isn’t allowed to discount his fees unless he’s prepared to offer the same discount to all his patients. Such an arrangement denies the physician the ability to provide charity on a case-by-case basis. If freed from those limitations, doctors would be free to provide charity. For example, I accept donations to a local food bank from some patients, in lieu of payment.

When you purchase health insurance, you are actually prepaying for health care. The difference between the premiums you pay and the costs you generate is profit for the insurance company. This is not how insurance was meant to be used. One should purchase insurance to cover for an unexpected, undesirable event that has catastrophic consequences. If one insured his car the same way as his health, gas and oil changes would be included. Those who bought it would use as much gas as possible as it was already prepaid. Premiums the following year would rise predictably. Car insurance would become unaffordable. We need to rethink what we want from insurance companies. Patients need to seek out policies that mitigate catastrophic risk and use the savings to pay for care they direct themselves, without a gatekeeper. Health savings accounts may be such an option.

Aren’t patients who’ve paid into Medicare for decades in the form of payroll taxes entitled to receive a benefit? It falls on the lone physician who stands between the patient and his entitled service to deliver the bad news. There is no “fund” to pay for expenses. The elderly are receiving care paid for by the taxation of younger workers. This is a pyramid scheme that would be illegal if run by private citizens. There will be a day of reckoning. Physicians can no longer pretend that the current Medicare and private pay insurance care systems are adequate to deliver quality care.

Patients too are realizing the failed promise of Medicare. Price fixing of physician services will lead to shortages and queues. One only has to remember the long lines for $1 gallon imposed in 1979. Staggering costs will ensure rationing will continue. This takes the form of patients requiring preauthorization (gate keeping) for procedures and medications, or outright denials. Medicare premiums will continue to rise.

Physicians have learned the political will exists only to delay the problem for another party to solve. This is like debating which antibiotic to use on a cancer when the solution is a scalpel, and the will to use it. Insurers must stop interceding in the doctor-patient relationship. Insurers add nothing beneficial to this interaction. In medical terms, they are a parasite. The insurer should serve the patient, who pays their premiums, directly. If a competitive marketplace for insurance across state lines is created, patients who don’t perceive value, may switch to another insurer.

The Medicare program is a broken business model. Physician shortages are occurring as a result of price-fixing. Patients are losing access to their physicians. Therefore, holding insurance or Medicare cards doesn’t equate with access. By opting out of all government and insurance contracts, physicians can interact with patients directly. Competition, transparency and the lack of government/insurance company interference will permit doctors to remain accessible to their patients. Knowledge and planning provide for more options. Hoping for another Congress bailout in 2010 is not an option. Doctors know that. You need to as well.

Source: www.seattlepi.com

Questions Call Politi Insurance Agents & Brokers

818-709-8442

www.health-insurancecalifornia.com


This Time Around, Health-Care Revamp Has Wings

November 25, 2008

This Time Around, Health-Care Revamp Has Wings

WASHINGTON — The effort to overhaul the nation’s health system will begin next year with one clear advantage over previous attempts: A wide variety of interest groups are rooting for it to succeed rather than plotting to kill it.

That is a stark contrast to the last big health-care initiative in the early 1990s, when many of the same groups helped block any major change.

In addition, Barack Obama’s choice of Tom Daschle, a former Senate Majority Leader, as Secretary of Health and Human Services, puts a skilled navigator of Capitol Hill in charge of the president-elect’s bid to establish universal health care, which he has made a top priority.

[Tom Daschle] Getty Images

Former Senate Majority Leader Sen. Tom Daschle is interviewed by Tim Russert on Meet the Press in March 2008.

He goes in with good will from key interest groups that have been working behind the scenes to build momentum for health reform, an effort not seen since 1993-94 when President Bill Clinton tried and failed to pass a universal-coverage initiative. The groups include lobbyists for both the insurance industry and small businesses who led the fight against the Clinton effort.

On Wednesday, the insurance industry’s Washington trade group issued a statement saying it could accept new rules requiring companies to cover sick people, as well as healthy ones, as long as all Americans were required to have insurance, with subsidies for those who need them. The declaration by America’s Health Insurance Plans is a switch from the industry’s long-time opposition to rules that bar the common practice of weeding out customers who are likely to rack up too many bills.

In another sign of an early push for change, the powerful prescription-drug lobby has a new television ad out this week. “Early diagnosis and preventative treatment can save lives and lower health-care costs,” spokesman Montel Williams says in the ad. “That’s why everyone should have affordable health insurance.”

Motivations vary depending on the interest group. Business groups want to reduce the cost and improve the quality of care. Consumer groups and labor unions want subsidies to help people afford insurance. Doctors and hospitals would benefit if more patients had insurance and could pay their bills.

“You see a range of diverse stakeholders trying to work together to achieve health-care reform,” said Karen Ignagni, president of America’s Health Insurance Plans. “You see it on [Capitol] Hill, off the Hill, in various coalitions. And that’s very different than what we saw in the early ’90s.”

It is far from a done deal. For starters, the various players find it much easier to support a general concept than to support legislation creating a vast array of winners and losers.

“Talk is cheap on the front end of this thing,” said Robert Laszewski, a health care consultant and former insurance industry official. “The rubber hits the road when that 1,000-page document comes out with specifics.”

Landov

Sen. Edward Kennedy, center, was joined by Sen. Max Baucus, right, and Sen. Charles Grassley to discuss health care on Capitol Hill Wednesday.

Mr. Laszewski pointed to the issue of physician payments. Many in both parties want to boost quality and reduce costs by measuring the quality of health care delivered and tying payments to results, but there is no consensus on how to do that. Once doctors see the details of this idea, Mr. Laszewski predicted, “you’ll see the ugly side of health-care reform.”

Further, the nation’s dire financial situation makes any big spending plan difficult. During the campaign, Mr. Obama estimated his plan would cost some $100 billion per year. Some argue that the tough economic times make a major health-care initiative, particularly efforts to reduce costs, all the more urgent.

Veterans from the 1993 effort say they see more hopeful signs this time around. Substantively, there is more — though far from total — consensus on approaching the problem. The leaders in the Senate, Democrats Max Baucus of Montana and Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, are both moving toward the sort of plan Mr. Obama proposed in his presidential campaign.

[Ailing System]

The basic concept is this: A government-organized exchange would let individuals and small businesses buy coverage from private companies, or from a new government-run, Medicare-like plan. Subsidies would aid lower-income people. Large employers would be required to offer coverage or pay into a fund. Small employers would get a tax credit if they provided insurance. And a host of initiatives would be launched to reduce costs and improve quality.

Procedurally, both Sens. Baucus and Kennedy have signaled that they will push the issue early next year, not waiting for Mr. Obama. In 1993, a months-long delay in introducing the Clinton health plan was one of many factors later blamed for its demise.

Sen. Baucus met Wednesday with the Democratic and Republican leaders of the relevant committees, and they issued a statement promising to work together to “achieve comprehensive health-care reform.”

The insurance industry may provide the best case study of how things have changed. Two years ago, America’s Health Insurance Plans proposed a coverage plan, and since then the group has worked with other interests to help build momentum for action.

The group’s board made a conscious decision to be a “productive participant” in the debate this time, said Ms. Ignagni. She said members are excited by a variety of aspects of the Democratic approach, including the idea that every American would have coverage.

Source: wallstreetjournal.com

Questions call Politi Insurance Agents & Brokers

818-709-8442

www.health-insurancecalifornia.com


A Senator’s Health Plan

November 19, 2008

Re “Senator Takes Initiative on Health Care” (news article, Nov. 12):

The proposal by Senator Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana, is a partial step in the right direction, most notably with his common-sense suggestion to expand Medicaid and Medicare, two publicly financed, mostly privately delivered programs.

Medicare has just a fraction of the bloated administrative costs of private insurance, which slices 30 percent off the top for profits and paperwork, much of it spent on denying needed care.

Unfortunately, the Baucus plan has several poison pills: it would force everyone not presently covered to buy private insurance, and revives the discredited McCain plan of taxing health benefits for many employees, which would push some workers from employer-sponsored coverage into the shark-infested private market.

Both steps would buttress and further enrich the health insurance industry, which hardly needs the help, and fail to solve the health care crisis.

Millions of Americans have found out the hard way that access to coverage is not the same as access to care. A better, more cost-effective approach would be to simply expand Medicare to cover everyone, the only real way to assure guaranteed health care for all.

Source: newyorktimes.com

Questions Please call Politi Insurance Agents & Brokers

818-709-8442

www.health-insurancecalifornia.com


Clinton Takes the Lead—On Health Insurance Reform

November 19, 2008

Clinton Takes the Lead — on Health Insurance Reform

By Ceci Connolly
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) returned from the presidential campaign trail to Washington as relatively junior member of a chamber that prides itself on tradition, seniority and rules. So when she put out feelers seeking to leapfrog over more veteran senators in light of her national stature, the idea was quickly nixed.

So too was her hope to take the lead on health-care reform. Two Senate giants — Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, and Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), who is chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee — had already staked their claims on that turf.

Now it looks like she will get another crack at health-care reform efforts, after all.

While President-elect Barack Obama weighs whether to give his former rival a Cabinet post, Kennedy today deputized Clinton to run a special Senate task force on health insurance reform.

Clinton will lead “a committee working group” on insurance coverage, Kennedy announced, while Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) will oversee a subgroup on prevention and Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) is heading up the quality task force.

Kennedy, who is undergoing treatment for brain cancer, has made clear he intends to press Obama to deliver on campaign promises to broaden and improve America’s health systems. He plans to meet Wednesday with Baucus and the two top Republicans on their respective committees.

Source: www.washingtonpost.com

Questions Call Politi Insurance Insurance & Brokers

818-709-8442

www.health-insurancecalifornia.com


Commissioners to discuss health insurance Revamp

November 18, 2008

Commissioners to discuss health insurance revamp

By PAUL STONE
The Palestine Herald

PALESTINE Anderson County commissioners on Monday will hear from a representative of Gallagher & Associates in relation to possibly restructuring the county’s health insurance plan during a special meeting.

The meeting is set to begin at 8:30 a.m. in the County Courtroom of the Anderson County Courthouse Annex.

 After hearing from the representative, the commissioners are slated to conducted an insurance workshop.

The court will also canvass returns from the Nov. 4 general election during the meeting.

Other items included on Monday’s agenda are:

• CONSIDER budget amendments.

• CONSIDER approving payroll and bills.

• CONSIDER utilities crossing county roads.

• AUTHORIZE auditor to obtain bids for paving county roads, septic rock and base stone, iron ore gravel, corrugated metal culvert pipe, road oil (refined), cracked fuel oil, railroad tank car culverts and flat bed cars, office supplies, asphalt treated road material, bituminous cold patch material, asphaltic concrete hot mix and gasoline and diesel fuel for 2009 budget year.

Source: www.palestineherald.com

Questions Please Call Politi Insurance Agents & Brokers

818-709-8442

www.health-insurancecalifornia.com